83 people have saved Brice Larimer McClure's note about his ancestry, which I originally posted. |
Every year or so, I return to images I originally posted, and check to see who has saved each one. By now, more than 80 people have saved this unique, one-of-a-kind note, which I attached to 8 people in my husband's public family tree.
Clicking on the tree of each person who saved one of my unique images shows me where Brice or Brice's ancestors might fit into that tree.
It doesn't matter whether I believe the other person's tree to be accurate or not. My objective is to see who's on the tree and how these people might be related to my husband. Potential clues, in other words, to possible cousins.
Occasionally, I'm able to identify a solid cousin possibility. I double-check what's on the other person's tree and reexamine my tree's connection to that ancestor. Then I send a message about this possible cousin connection and offer to exchange additional genealogical info. And, thankfully, a few people have responded and continued to correspond about mutual research interests!
I know there are more cousins out there to be found via family trees and paper trails (DNA is not my primary focus at this point). If someone has saved a unique image or note that I originally uploaded, it's worth a few minutes of my time to check that person's tree.
Those unique images are cousin bait!
Marian, you are so right about images - unique or at least not common - being terrific cousin bait. The only downside is that, like with DNA matches, some people readily respond to contact while others never reply. Checking to see who saves your image is a great methodology hint.
ReplyDeleteI agree with your attitude about trees. Some people get so worked up about incorrect trees and lack of sources that they miss an opportunity.
ReplyDelete