Sunday, July 20, 2025

FamilySearch Full-Text Search: Mary Slatter Wood's Will












Following the theme of Randy Seaver's Saturday Night Genealogy Fun, I decided to plug in some names from my husband's family tree and try the FamilySearch Full-Text Search functionality. I've done only a few searches previously and this was my opportunity to experiment a bit more.

AI transcript, highlighting, and summary helped



At first, I searched for my hubby's maternal ancestors from the mid-1800s, and found lots of mortgage and deed listings in legal ledgers. These men and women borrowed money and obtained mortgages for various Ohio properties they bought and sold over decades. Above, hubby's great-grandparents E.G. Steiner and Elizabeth J. Steiner had land dealings in Hancock County, Ohio. 

The AI transcript and the highlighting (shown above) plus the document summary helped me get the gist of these documents quickly. Some of these ancestors, including E.G., had to be legally pressured to pay off loans, but I wasn't particularly excited by any of the content.

Check pages before and after

Then I entered the name of my husband's grandfather, James Edgar Wood (1871-1939), knowing that as a builder, he would also have properties in the deeds and mortgages books. Yup. But he was also the executor of his first wife's will and appears in the probate records, none of which I had ever seen.

Mary Slatter Wood (1869-1925), sadly died of heart problems at the age of 55. Her will, dated four months before her death, leaves everything to her husband. It's a simple and straightforward document with no frills. I was a little surprised to learn that she made no specific bequests to her four sons. Maybe she didn't know she could do that kind of thing, or perhaps she was already feeling so weak that she and her husband James wanted to get the will completed in a hurry. Or maybe her husband insisted on full control because only one of their four children was of legal age when the will was signed.

Because James's name was not necessarily on every page, I clicked several pages forward and backward to examine every part of the complete probate file. Nobody contested the will, of course, and it sped through probate quickly. 

What they jointly owned

I had no idea Mary actually had a share of any property. But, as the probate excerpt at left shows, she had a share of the family's money in bank and stock, worth no more than $40. She also was co-owner of the family's home and the home next door--both of which were constructed by her husband James. 

For probate purposes, he valued the two houses and properties at no more than $25,000. In today's dollars, a century after Mary's death, the combined value is about $460,000, a considerable sum that was inaccessible because it was tied up in real estate.

Mary Wood's death was a turning point for the family. Her son Edgar, away at college at the time of her death, came home for the funeral but never lived under his father James's roof again. James had refused to give Edgar the money saved for education and in fact, wanted his son to forget about college and find work to support the household. Edgar defied his Dad and enrolled in college, paying the way by playing piano at college functions. He was just one college course away from graduation but never was able to pass a French exam, so he left without a diploma.

Thanks to Randy for the nudge to dig into full-text search a little deeper!

3 comments:

  1. Greed and control. Only 1 course left but.....

    ReplyDelete
  2. That's a great find! Even in the 1920s, it was unusual to find a woman with separate property of her own unless there was a previous marriage. If James wouldn't give Edgar the money for his education, maybe he was a bit controlling and that is why Mary left her property to him. Of course, with 3 of 4 children under legal age, that might have complicated distribution of assets.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You found a lot of documents that will add to your family's story. I admit that I am a bit surprised that Mary's estate went through a formal probate, considering that everything was going to her husband. Maybe it was necessary because there were children who were not mentioned in the will?

    ReplyDelete