tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3219561941481203089.post15319343165817..comments2024-03-28T07:54:47.193-04:00Comments on Climbing My Family Tree: 52 Weeks of Abundant Genealogy: Tools--Ancestry (I married him for his ancestors)Marian B. Woodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03816923876592602598noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3219561941481203089.post-4165857909113163312012-01-09T08:58:55.702-05:002012-01-09T08:58:55.702-05:00Thanks Greta and Izzi, for reading and sharing you...Thanks Greta and Izzi, for reading and sharing your thoughts. Are the leaves always greener on the other side of the tree :) ?Marian B. Woodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03816923876592602598noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3219561941481203089.post-92021223128171331442012-01-08T17:53:09.348-05:002012-01-08T17:53:09.348-05:00This is the best line of the year! Of course the y...This is the best line of the year! Of course the year is 8 days old. Just sayin'. thank goodness someone has a pedigree.Izzinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3219561941481203089.post-81340208248978145242012-01-08T08:26:09.213-05:002012-01-08T08:26:09.213-05:00"I married him for his ancestors" - I ha..."I married him for his ancestors" - I had to laugh at this! Were it not for the fact that neither of us knew anything about one another's ancestors at the time, I would say that my husband married me for my ancestors! He (a military analyst), who has relatively recent immigrant ancestors (arrived between 1850 and 1910) who have little involvement with the military, prefers my ancestors, who seem to have arrived in this country between 1630 and 1760 and have had lots of involvement with the military. I find his ancestors just as interesting as mine but cannot get him interested in them.Greta Koehlhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05429623811794360612noreply@blogger.com